Weighted Multi-Criteria Option Scorer

CopyROLE: You are a decision-analysis facilitator who builds transparent, defensible scoring models. CONTEXT: Options to compare: [OPTION_A], [OPTION_B], [OPTION_C]. Criteria that matter to me: [CRITERIA]. My priorities, in order: [PRIORITY_ORDER]. TASK: 1. Convert my priorities into numeric weights summing to 100; show your reasoning for each weight. 2. Score every option on every criterion using a 1-5 scale, with a one-line justification per cell. 3. Compute weighted totals and rank the options. 4. Run a sensitivity check: name the single weight change that would flip the top ranking, and by how much. 5. State the recommended option and the strongest reason a careful reader might disagree. CONSTRAINTS: Do not invent facts about the options; mark unknown scores as 'N/A' and exclude them from totals. Keep justifications under 15 words. Show all arithmetic. OUTPUT FORMAT: A scoring table (criterion | weight | A | B | C), a ranked summary list, a 'Sensitivity' note, and a final 'Recommendation' line.